Direction: In the question below there are two statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. All shirts are trousers. II. No trouser is the jacket. Conclusions: I. Some shirts are jackets. II. Some jackets are trousers.

Report

Report an issue

Name

Email

Message

Submit

Cancel

RRB NTPC Exam 27 Jan 2021 click here to view all questions

Direction: In the question below there are two statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. All shirts are trousers. II. No trouser is the jacket. Conclusions: I. Some shirts are jackets. II. Some jackets are trousers.

AOnly conclusion I follows.

BOnly conclusion Ii follows.

CEither conclusion I or II follows.

DNeither conclusion I nor II follows.

Akhilesh ? Apr 1 '25 at 20:40

correct answer is: option d (d)[Neither conclusion I nor II follows.]
Explanation: Let's analyze the statements and conclusions using a Venn diagram. Statement I: All shirts are trousers. This means the circle representing "shirts" is entirely contained within the circle representing "trousers." Statement II: No trouser is a jacket. This means the circles representing "trousers" and "jackets" do not intersect. Now let's evaluate the conclusions: Conclusion I: Some shirts are jackets. Since all shirts are trousers and no trousers are jackets, no shirts can be jackets. This conclusion is false. Conclusion II: Some jackets are trousers. Statement II clearly states that no trousers are jackets, meaning no jackets are trousers. This conclusion is also false. Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II follows logically from the given statements.

• Option a: [Only conclusion I follows] This is incorrect because conclusion I does not follow.
• Option b: [Only conclusion II follows] This is incorrect because conclusion II does not follow.
• Option c: [Either conclusion I or II follows] This is incorrect because neither conclusion follows.

View Answer

Discuss

Direction: In the question below there are two statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. All bottles are cups. II. Some cups are jugs. Conclusions: I. Some bottles are jugs. II. No jug is cup.

Report

Report an issue

Name

Email

Message

Submit

Cancel

RRB NTPC Exam 27 Jan 2021 click here to view all questions

Direction: In the question below there are two statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. All bottles are cups. II. Some cups are jugs. Conclusions: I. Some bottles are jugs. II. No jug is cup.

AOnly conclusion I follows.

BOnly conclusion II follows.

CEither conclusion I or II follows.

DNeither conclusion I nor II follows.

Akhilesh ? Apr 1 '25 at 20:40

correct answer is: option d : Neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Explanation: The given statements are: I. All bottles are cups. II. Some cups are jugs. Let's analyze the conclusions: Conclusion I: Some bottles are jugs. Since all bottles are inside the cups, and some cups are jugs, it's possible that the jugs and bottles don't overlap. Therefore, this conclusion doesn't necessarily follow. Conclusion II: No jug is cup. This is definitively false based on the given information that *some* cups are jugs. Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II follows.

• Option a : Only conclusion I follows. This is incorrect because Conclusion I does not necessarily follow.
• Option b : Only conclusion II follows. This is incorrect because Conclusion II does not follow. In fact, it contradicts the given statements.
• Option c : Either conclusion I or II follows. This is incorrect because neither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II necessarily follows.
• Option d : Neither conclusion I nor II follows. This is the correct answer because neither conclusion can be definitively derived from the given statements.

View Answer

Discuss

Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: No actor is an engineer. All engineers are magicians. Conclusions: I. No magician is an engineer. II. Some magicians are engineers.

Report

Report an issue

Name

Email

Message

Submit

Cancel

RRB NTPC Exam 27 Jan 2021 click here to view all questions

Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: No actor is an engineer. All engineers are magicians. Conclusions: I. No magician is an engineer. II. Some magicians are engineers.

AOnly conclusion I follows

BBoth conclusions follow

CEither conclusion I or II follows

DOnly conclusion II follows

Akhilesh ? Apr 1 '25 at 20:40

correct answer is: option d : Only conclusion II follows
Explanation: The statements establish a relationship between actors, engineers, and magicians. Let's analyze each conclusion:

• Conclusion I: No magician is an engineer. This conclusion is incorrect. The statement "All engineers are magicians" implies that engineers are a subset of magicians. Therefore, some magicians *must* be engineers.
• Conclusion II: Some magicians are engineers. This conclusion is correct. Since all engineers are magicians, it directly follows that at least some magicians are engineers. This can be visualized with a Venn diagram where the 'Engineers' circle is entirely within the 'Magicians' circle.

View Answer

Discuss

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: 1) All students in my class are active. 2) Rohini is not active. Conclusions: I. Rohini is not a student of my class. II. Rohini must be active.

Report

Report an issue

Name

Email

Message

Submit

Cancel

RRB NTPC Exam 27 Jan 2021 click here to view all questions

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: 1) All students in my class are active. 2) Rohini is not active. Conclusions: I. Rohini is not a student of my class. II. Rohini must be active.

ABoth conclusions I and II follow.

BOnly conclusion I follows.

COnly conclusion II follows.

DNeither conclusion I nor II follows.

Akhilesh ? Apr 1 '25 at 20:40

correct answer is: option b : Only conclusion I follows.
Explanation: The first statement indicates that all students in the class possess the characteristic of being "active." The second statement says Rohini is not active. Conclusion I logically follows because if all students in the class are active, and Rohini is not active, then Rohini cannot be a student in the class. Conclusion II is incorrect because the premise states that Rohini is *not* active.

• Option a: Both conclusions I and II do not follow simultaneously. Conclusion II contradicts the given statement that Rohini is not active.
• Option b: This option correctly states that only conclusion I follows logically from the statements.
• Option c: Conclusion II is incorrect as it contradicts the provided statement that Rohini is not active.
• Option d: Conclusion I logically follows from the statements; therefore, this option is incorrect.

View Answer

Discuss

In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: Ramesh's friend helped him to get a loan. Conclusions: I: Ramesh's friend was supportive. II: Ramesh had many friends.

Report

Report an issue

Name

Email

Message

Submit

Cancel

RRB NTPC Exam 27 Jan 2021 click here to view all questions

In the question, two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: Ramesh's friend helped him to get a loan. Conclusions: I: Ramesh's friend was supportive. II: Ramesh had many friends.

AOnly conclusion I follows

BOnly conclusion II follows

CNeither I or II follows

DBoth I and II follow

Akhilesh ? Apr 1 '25 at 20:39

correct answer is: option a (a)[Only conclusion I follows]
Explanation: Conclusion I directly follows from the statement. If Ramesh's friend helped him get a loan, it implies the friend was supportive. Conclusion II is a jump in logic. Just because one friend helped him, doesn't mean Ramesh has many friends.

• Option a: Conclusion I is a direct consequence of the statement.
• Option b: The statement doesn't provide information about how many friends Ramesh has.
• Option c: Conclusion I does follow.
• Option d: Conclusion II is not supported by the statement.

View Answer

Discuss